Philosophy Dictionary of Arguments

Home Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Implication: Implication in logic is a relationship between two statements, where the second statement follows from the first statement. It is symbolized by the arrow symbol (→). See also Konditional, Inference, Conclusion, Logic.
_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Concept Summary/Quotes Sources

Logic Texts on Implication - Dictionary of Arguments

II 109
Implication: Instead of a logically correct conclusion, one also speaks of a valid or deductive conclusion, instead of conclusion one also speaks of implication.
The premises imply the conclusion.

Def correct/correctness/statement logic/Hoyningen-Huene: be A and B statement logical formulas. The conclusion from A to B is called propositionally correct, exactly when A > B is propositionally true.
>Correctness
.
II 110
The trick is that in [the above] definition the required propositional truth of A > B means different things, depending on whether A > B is a statement or a propositional formula. >Statement, >Formula.

_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments
The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Logic Texts
Me I Albert Menne Folgerichtig Denken Darmstadt 1988
HH II Hoyningen-Huene Formale Logik, Stuttgart 1998
Re III Stephen Read Philosophie der Logik Hamburg 1997
Sal IV Wesley C. Salmon Logic, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1973 - German: Logik Stuttgart 1983
Sai V R.M.Sainsbury Paradoxes, Cambridge/New York/Melbourne 1995 - German: Paradoxien Stuttgart 2001


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Logic Texts
> Counter arguments in relation to Implication

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Y   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-27
Legal Notice   Contact   Data protection declaration